Skip to main content

Freedom as Unrestricted Access to Evolutionary Environment

Freedom as Unrestricted Access to Evolutionary Environment

We cannot be limited by the universe in itself because we are enabled by the universe; we are a piece of the universe. Defining free will based upon the restrictions of our framework is a byproduct of mis-attribution of independence to our being from the underlying framework. We are not separate actors from the underlying cosmos but embedded in the cosmos, part and parcel of cosmos. Following universal laws is indentical to following our own wishes and whimsies.

Freedom is thus engagement with and access to the cosmos, to the natural environs a species evolved in and from. Any restriction on free will is restriction of access of the human being (or the sentient species) from their environment, from their cosmos, from their natural environs.

This cannot be acted upon by the universe upon inhabitants, but can, strangely enough, be enacted upon inhabitants in that cosmos by other inhabitant agents, who may attempt to restrict access and resources from other agents in order to exploit access to the base environs for themselves.

Jenny Lorraine Nielsen

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Two videos with Deepak Chopra in which I appear:

Quanglebits and my Hopf Fiber Obsession

Background: https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Hopf+fibration Project A: Towards defining a unit measure of quantum information, a quanglebit, written as a Hopf bundle over a Bloch hypersphere in complex space, which unlike the qubit is sensitive to quantum entanglement and could contain entanglement information. (There is past work to cite here that goes so far as mentioning the Bloch sphere and qubits and that the Hopf fibration is a way to redo the qubit, but does not redefine a new measure of information -- I think it is crucial at this point to redefine our measure of quantum information and get away from the limitations of the qubit structure, which is not easy to describe entanglement therewith.) Beginning date of project: 2013 (with many breaks). While hardly trivial, not a difficult project.  Project B : Redefining the fields [EM and QFT] and Schrodinger on the Hopf fiber bundle (approximate beginning date of project: June 2008). 
  (Proposed Family Tree of Heloise Du Paraclet aka Heloise d'Argenteuil) Jennifer Lorraine Nielsen The Paraclete records hold that Heloise's mother is named Hersinde. Abelard refers to Heloise's foster father, Fulbert, as her "avunculus" -- her maternal uncle. Hersende of Fontrevaud (Champigne/Champagne) lives to be too old (to at least 1114), and would have had Heloise at too advanced an age, to make a satisfying candidate for Heloise's mother. It would become difficult to justify Heloise's placement at Argenteuil, or Abelard's avoidance of directly referencing Heloise's connection to Fontrevaud. I've fostered a suspicion for some time that Fulbert is not Heloise's biological uncle. He is too often speculated to be her real dad, or on a different line of thinking, to have had romantic interest in Heloise. I theorized perhaps Fulbert is her "spiritual" uncle in Christ, and she the product of an ex-wife entering a convent and becom...